AE 08: Understanding Probabilities with COVID-19 Rapid Self-Administered Tests
Suggested answers
Goal
Learn to calculate and interpret the probability of having a disease given a positive test result using sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence data.
Scenario:
You are provided with the following data for COVID-19 rapid self-administered tests and population statistics from Pima County, Arizona found in Lecture 12.
Understand the Definitions:
Sensitivity
: Probability of a positive test given the person has the disease.Specificity
: Probability of a negative test given the person does not have the disease.Prevalence
: Probability that a randomly selected person has the disease.
Formulate Bayes’ Rule:
We know that:
And:
Where:
Exercises
Using the given data, calculate the probability that an individual has COVID-19 given a positive test result
Substitute the Given Values:
- Sensitivity:
= 0.087 - Specificity:
= 0.642 - Prevalence:
= 0.998. among persons aged 10 years and older.
- Sensitivity:
Calculate the Complementary Probabilities
: Probability of a positive test given no disease. : Probability of not having the disease.
Calculate the Probability of a Positive Test
:
- Calculate the Posterior Probability
Discussion Questions:
Is this calculation surprising?
- Considering the given sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence, is the high probability of having the disease given a positive test result unexpected? Why or why not?
- No, given the high specificity, false positives are minimal, so a positive result is likely accurate.
What is the explanation?
- Explain why the probability of having the disease given a positive test result is so high. Consider the impact of sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence.
- The combination of high specificity and moderate sensitivity ensures that the test reliably rules out non-disease cases, contributing to the high posterior probability.
Was this calculation actually reasonable to perform?
- Discuss whether it is reasonable to calculate the probability of having the disease based on the given data. Are there any limitations or assumptions in this calculation?
- Yes, but assumptions such as perfect accuracy of prevalence data and no external biases limit real-world applicability.
What if we tested in a different population, such as high-risk individuals?
- How might the probability of having the disease given a positive test result change if the test was administered to a population with a higher prevalence of COVID-19?
- The posterior probability would increase with higher prevalence.
What if we were to test a random individual in a county where the prevalence of COVID-19 is approximately 25%?
- Recalculate the probability of having the disease given a positive test result for a population with a 25% prevalence of COVID-19. How does this compare to the original calculation?
- If prevalence = 25%: